Article gave me too much the impression they had nothing exciting to write
and just tried to attract traffic by reviving an old debate. Only the
"Primitive Ajax Support" part is new to me, most likely triggered by SPA
hype these days. Well, my answer to that would be
http://stackoverflow.com/q/7108668/157882
Cheers, B
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:
> It's really a poorly written article; the points are very weak. Especially
> the point about it "lacking flexibility". I have worked on quite a few
> projects, and never once has there been a need for another warning level.
> That's a really bad example; the fact that JSF is flexible is one of the #1
> reasons to use it.
>
> It looks to me like Cameron's thinking about JSF has evolved. He wrote in
> a previous tutoria
> <http://www.theserverside.com/tutorial/Creating-a-single-page-inteface-SPI-with-JSF-Facelets-Ajax-and-HTML5>l
> about how to build single-page apps with JSF, and that book.
>
> At any rate, does anyone actually read TheServerSide.com anymore?
>
> ___
>
> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE, and Liferay training
> and consulting
> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io
> <http://knowesis.io/web/webcomponents> - fresh Web Components info
> +1 203-998-0403
>
> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
> <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
> <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I came across a new anti-JSF article.
>>
>>
>> http://www.theserverside.com/feature/Five-drawbacks-to-choosing-JSF-as-your-web-application-framework
>>
>> Sadly, I cannot find a way to comment.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Cagatay Civici
>> PrimeFaces Lead
>> PrimeTek Informatics
>> www.primefaces.org
>>
>>
>