+1 to FacesFlow as well.
Regards,
On 16.Mar.2012, at 16:39, Edward Burns wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:59:41 +0100, "Andy Bosch" <andy.bosch_at_jsf-forum.de> said:
>
> AB> I think "task flow" is a bit dangerous. I mean, JSF is an
> AB> _UI_ framework, business logic should be implemented somewhere else.
> AB> And having "tasks" inside JSF could inidcate we are aiming to do
> AB> complex service logic inside JSF.
>
> AB> I prefer the term "Faces Flow", but "flowlet" is fine as well.
>
> Resolved, we'll go back to "Faces Flow" as listed in the November 2011
> JSF 2.2 Early Draft Review. Now, let's please get to the hard work of
> actually specifying this thing!
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
Çağatay Çivici
Principal Consultant
PrimeFaces Lead | JSF EG Member
Prime Teknoloji
Bilkent Cyberpark, A-303d
06800 Ankara/Turkey
Tel: +90 312 265 05 07
http://www.prime.com.tr