As to spec changes, there's one more important change mentioned in
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1421
Basically, the statement "is a Portlet request" should be replaced by
"UIViewRoot is a NamingContainer". This affects section 2.2.6.1, as
mentioned in spec 1421.
Cheers, B
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have done a bit more additional work for spec790:
> - hidden state fields weren't properly updated after ajax navigation
> - in a namespaced view, a manual jsf.ajax.request() call without namespace
> didn't properly work (previously it did).
>
> The issue is now finally closed! \o/
>
> As to things which should absolutely not miss in the spec:
> - mention of new (optional) dependency on JSR356 Websocket and JSR353
> JSONP.
> - explicit mention how to properly use FacesWrapper#getWrapped(), see also
> http://arjan-tijms.omnifaces.org/p/jsf-23.html#1429
> - update overview of public API constants with new ones listed in
> http://arjan-tijms.omnifaces.org/p/jsf-23.html#1428
>
> Cheers, B
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:20:20 +0100, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com>
>> said:
>>
>> B> 1) I have done:
>>
>> I'm reviewing these now.
>>
>> B> 2) I am currently doing:
>> B> - Fix view state in cross form PRR, this is technically already
>> finished
>> B> and fully working on Mojarra side with IT and all, except for one
>> corner
>> B> case with render="@all", I will look at it this month:
>> B> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-790
>>
>> Of your many issues, this is the only one not marked CLOSED. What
>> remains on this one? It is referenced in the spec PDF document.
>>
>> B> - There should be a ViewHandler#getWebsocketURL()
>>
>> Yes, I see that. Thanks.
>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 08:00:48 -0700, manfred riem <
>> manfred.riem_at_oracle.com> said:
>>
>> MR> And for 1) and 2) if there is going to be a need for any text in the
>> MR> Specification (the PDF document).
>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:40:47 +0100, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com>
>> said:
>>
>> B> Frankly, I have no idea. I gather this job is up to the spec lead. As
>> said,
>> B> a javadoc diff would be very helpful to see new and changed things for
>> the
>> B> spec.
>>
>> Actually this is why we have the changebars, and I really am glad to see
>> everyone following this burdensome practice. It really helps developers
>> see what's new.
>>
>> You are right to point out that is the job of the spec lead, but if you
>> happen to know of something you added that does need to be addressed in
>> the spec PDF document, it would be great to have you volunteer that, as
>> an additional safety measure. As it is, you've already provided the
>> text for f:websocket out of band and I'm integrating that now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> --
>> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
>> | 8 business days until planned start of JSF 2.3 Public Review
>> | 28 business days until DevNexus 2017
>> | 53 business days until JavaLand 2017
>>
>
>