It's really a poorly written article; the points are very weak. Especially
the point about it "lacking flexibility". I have worked on quite a few
projects, and never once has there been a need for another warning level.
That's a really bad example; the fact that JSF is flexible is one of the #1
reasons to use it.
It looks to me like Cameron's thinking about JSF has evolved. He wrote
in a previous
tutoria
<
http://www.theserverside.com/tutorial/Creating-a-single-page-inteface-SPI-with-JSF-Facelets-Ajax-and-HTML5>l
about how to build single-page apps with JSF, and that book.
At any rate, does anyone actually read TheServerSide.com anymore?
___
Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE, and Liferay training and
consulting
Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io
<
http://knowesis.io/web/webcomponents> - fresh Web Components info
+1 203-998-0403
* Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
<
http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
<
http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across a new anti-JSF article.
>
>
> http://www.theserverside.com/feature/Five-drawbacks-to-choosing-JSF-as-your-web-application-framework
>
> Sadly, I cannot find a way to comment.
>
> Regards,
>
> Cagatay Civici
> PrimeFaces Lead
> PrimeTek Informatics
> www.primefaces.org
>
>