Yep, did that already.
On Sep 19, 2016 16:32, "David Delabassee" <david.delabassee_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> Make sure to also take the survey (*) to express your views on MVC but
> also on the rest of the proposal.
>
> (*) http://glassfish.org/survey/
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On 19/09/16 16:16, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This week at JavaOne its been mentioned a few times that MVC 1.0 is not
>> going to be carried forward in the Java EE 8 spec. At today's talk, Linda
>> did recommend people to share their opinions and this was one of the
>> channels listed.
>>
>> It seems to me that MVC may not be understood completely. One of the
>> benefits I see in the MVC spec is that I can have a backend domain model
>> and choose what the client's view of that domain model are. This is
>> actually a huge pain point with DDD and the underlying bounded context is
>> of the service that is powering it.
>>
>> You can certainly define this using things like JSON-P, or even JSON-B,
>> but with the MVC spec, I would have been able to define the client's view
>> using a template engine to generate the proper JSON.
>>
>> So to me, MVC is a much needed framework for Java EE.
>>
>> John
>>
>
>