users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] Re: [jsr366-experts] Standardizing logging

From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:18:29 +0200

@Antonio: can you point out what you want to standardize? Seems
java.util.logging is here and already standard. Only missing thing from my
point of view is "application" configuration but not sure it does worth a
JSR, do yuo have something else in mind?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-04-14 20:00 GMT+02:00 Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> I've mentioned standardizing logging so many time [1], that I'll make it
> short this time (BTW, on a day to day basis, as a developper, I still
> struggle with logs).
>
> But this time I saw this blog, so I couldn't stop from thinking about it : *On
> the top 20 Java GitHub projects, 6 are related to logging* [2] I know
> logging wasn't in the top priorities of the Java EE 8 survey, but I think
> it's also our duty to acknowledge that, if so many logging framework
> exists, then, there is a demand.
>
> Antonio
>
> [1]
> http://antoniogoncalves.org/2012/09/06/i-need-you-for-logging-api-spec-lead/
> [2]
> http://blog.takipi.com/we-analyzed-60678-libraries-on-github-here-are-the-top-100/
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Pluralsight
> <http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> | Paris
> JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>
>