On 07/01/2015 10:59, arjan tijms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine_at_sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine_at_sabot-durand.net>> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> For instance today with CDI doc if someone ask a question about producer method I can easily answer by sending a
> link to the doc like this : http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#producer_method.
>
> IMO It would lower learning curve and ease adoption to have something similar for each other spec.
>
> What do you think ?
>
>
> Would be great indeed. If I remember correctly this was discussed during various EG meetups (e.g. I think at Devoxx 2
> years ago). Part of the problem was that the spec text is now in various formats, and who's going to convert that to
> something else? Mojarra for instance uses the FrameMaker format now.
>
I think the main obstacle is not technical but legal: some JSRs require readers to accept a licence agreement before
downloading the spec. For example the JMS 2.0 spec (my spec) at
http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/jms-2_0-fr-eval-spec/index.html
offers two different licences which the reader needs to choose between before downloading.
Nigel