On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Martin Grebac <martin.grebac_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 15.07.14 12:05, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
>> Hi Linda and all,
>>
>> You can count on me as a supporter.
>>
> Thank you.
>
> Some thoughts though :
>>
>> * In 2.2 "/The target of the JSR is SE 7/". Why not SE 8 ? The APIs
>>
>> could start laveraging some novelties of SE 8.
>>
>> Do you have any specific novelties in mind? The reasoning behing is not
> to limit supporting implementations in the choice of JDK. I've heard more
> feedback on the version choice so we'll take it under consideration.
>
I don't know if this could be appropriate or non, but the use of Optional
looks interesting for writing more expressive APIs. But again, I can see
the benefit of being able to run on Java SE 7.
>
> * Any plans to embrace Bean Validation ?
>>
>> Yes, even though not stated explicitly in the proposal.
>
Good to know. A shame JAXB doesn't (it would even make more sense with the
generation of XSD)
>
> * Any integration plans with JPA (eg. an @Entity is automatically
>> marshalled by JSON-B) ?
>>
>> No, not at this point.
>
Maybe something to address in the JPA expert group at a later stage.
Antonio
>
> MartiNG
>
> Antonio
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Linda DeMichiel <
>> linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com <mailto:linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>>wrote:
>>
>>
>> The current draft of the new JSR for JSON-B 1.0 that Oracle plans to
>> submit is attached.
>>
>> We would like to know if your company would like to be listed as a
>> supporter of the JSR when we submit it to the JCP. For those of you
>> who are individual members of this expert group, please let me know if
>> you would like to be listed as an individual supporting the JSR.
>>
>> Our plan is to submit this JSR some time in August, so please send me
>> your response before then.
>>
>> Please also feel free to send any suggestions you might have with
>> regard to the content of the JSR to me or, better, to the spec lead.
>> We may not be able to accommodate more than minor comments before
>> submission of the JSR, but of course its final content will be
>> discussed and decided by the normal Expert Group processes once the
>> new group is underway.
>>
>> Again, regardless of whether or not you have comments, please let us
>> know if you'd like to be listed as a supporter of this JSR.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> - Linda
>>
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter <
>> http://twitter.com/agoncal>| LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>
>> | Pluralsight <http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/
>> antonio-goncalves> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France
>> <http://www.devoxx.fr>
>>
>
> --
> Martin Grebac, SW Engineering Manager, TopLink
> Oracle Czech, Prague
>
>
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> |
Pluralsight
<http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> | Paris
JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>