Well for future slides maybe, that one's done;-)
Werner
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for posting this!
>
> One thing that can be improved here; slide 25 and 28 are still using the
> term "authenticator" (should be authentication mechanism).
>
> The current proposal doesn't use an annotation for user provided ones, but
> rather the "one and only class implementing the simplified interface" and a
> typed annotation (no class argument) for build-in authentication mechanism
> (so the implementation can be vendor specific).
>
> Of course all of that is still in proposed state, but (correct me if I'm
> wrong) I think that is closer to the final API than the annotation with
> class name attribute.
>
> Anyway, thanks again for posting this and for speaking about it ;)
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Experts,
>>
>> Here's a picture from my JSR 375 session in Tel Aviv before Christmas:
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/codemotiontlv/photos/pb.564453833677998.-2207520000.1451834982./792488317541214/?type=3&theater
>>
>> I also just uploaded the slides to SlideShare:
>>
>> http://www.slideshare.net/keilw/jsr-375-have-you-seen-java-ee-security-api-lately-codemotion-tel-aviv-2015
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Werner
>>
>
>