Of course for future slides ;)
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Well for future slides maybe, that one's done;-)
>
> Werner
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for posting this!
>>
>> One thing that can be improved here; slide 25 and 28 are still using the
>> term "authenticator" (should be authentication mechanism).
>>
>> The current proposal doesn't use an annotation for user provided ones,
>> but rather the "one and only class implementing the simplified interface"
>> and a typed annotation (no class argument) for build-in authentication
>> mechanism (so the implementation can be vendor specific).
>>
>> Of course all of that is still in proposed state, but (correct me if I'm
>> wrong) I think that is closer to the final API than the annotation with
>> class name attribute.
>>
>> Anyway, thanks again for posting this and for speaking about it ;)
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Arjan Tijms
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Experts,
>>>
>>> Here's a picture from my JSR 375 session in Tel Aviv before Christmas:
>>>
>>> https://www.facebook.com/codemotiontlv/photos/pb.564453833677998.-2207520000.1451834982./792488317541214/?type=3&theater
>>>
>>> I also just uploaded the slides to SlideShare:
>>>
>>> http://www.slideshare.net/keilw/jsr-375-have-you-seen-java-ee-security-api-lately-codemotion-tel-aviv-2015
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Werner
>>>
>>
>>
>