Hi,
Good point. I'd rather not get started on API / Spec vs. RI, since many
JSRs and even EC members have different thoughts and interpretations of
that;-)
Most view the "javax.*" part as "implementation" of the spec already, hence
all artifacts usuallly carry the RI license(s) even if "api" and "ri" are
independent pieces of software.
However, most JSRs have a separate package and many declare a project name
like "Jersey", etc. Regardless of the package name being under
"org.glassfish" or not.
Having one would give the JSR a better visibility and identity;-)
Werner
Am 16.10.2015 22:28 schrieb "arjan tijms" <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Most Java EE specs distinguish between the API part of the spec and
> the implementation part.
>
> So far we have not really discussed this for JSR 375.
>
> For the implementation part I guess we'd need a package name and
> perhaps a name for the RI?
>
> If I understood correctly, package names for Oracle led specs RIs are
> now org.glassfish.something (see new MVC project).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>