Hey Alexey,
sorry but i can't provide feedback, yet. Moving to Servlet 3.1 requires updating
several existing Servlets in our Server which will take some work before i can
start testing the new, shiny stuff.
Oleksiy Stashok <oleksiy.stashok_at_oracle.com> hat am 22. August 2012 um 16:21
geschrieben:
> Hi guys,
>
> we're planning to make 2.3 release this week (required by GF), will
> appreciate your feedback on Servlet 3.1 support.
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
> On 08/15/2012 06:55 PM, Arens, Marc wrote:
> > Great! I'll update to the latest snapshot, see how our existing servlets
> > like it
> > and then look at the 3.* stuff.
> > Thank you very much for the fast implementation.
> >
> > Oleksiy Stashok <oleksiy.stashok_at_oracle.com> hat am 15. August 2012 um 17:50
> > geschrieben:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> asynchronous I/O support (Servlet 3.1) is commited as well.
> >> Your feedback is welcome :)
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> WBR,
> >> Alexey.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08/15/2012 02:39 PM, Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> I've commited initial Servlet 3.0-based implementation, it has to
> >>> support asynchronous processing (including dispatch).
> >>> The Grizzly version is 2.3-SNAPSHOT, sources could be found @ git
> >>> branch "2.3.x".
> >>> I'm in a process of deploying 2.3-SNAPSHOT binaries to the maven repo,
> >>> so they have to be available soon.
> >>>
> >>> Will appreciate if you can test the implementation and provide feedback.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> WBR,
> >>> Alexey.
> >>>
> >>> On 08/09/2012 02:15 PM, Matthew Swift wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8 August 2012 20:23, Ryan Lubke <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com
> >>>> <mailto:ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/8/12 7:43 AM, Matthew Swift wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the status of the Servlet support in Grizzly 2.x? Is
> >>>> it pretty stable? At the moment it seems to have a dependency
> >>>> on Servlet 2.5 - do you plan to support Servlet 3.0 at some
> >>>> point[1], in particular the support for asynchronous processing?
> >>>>
> >>>> What would you guys think of initial support for Servlet 3.1?
> >>>> The 3.0 async aspect we can support for sure, but if we moved to
> >>>> the 3.1 api, we can expose the non-blocking I/O. Is that of any
> >>>> interest?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> NIO support is something which is definitely of interest to me in the
> >>>> long term, however in the short term I need to maintain compatibility
> >>>> with existing J2EE 6 containers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Matt
> > Best regards,
> > Marc
>
Best regards,
Marc