Hi Marc,
no problem :) looking forward to hear from you once you have time.
WBR,
Alexey.
On 08/22/2012 05:21 PM, Arens, Marc wrote:
> Hey Alexey,
>
> sorry but i can't provide feedback, yet. Moving to Servlet 3.1 requires updating
> several existing Servlets in our Server which will take some work before i can
> start testing the new, shiny stuff.
>
> Oleksiy Stashok <oleksiy.stashok_at_oracle.com> hat am 22. August 2012 um 16:21
> geschrieben:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we're planning to make 2.3 release this week (required by GF), will
>> appreciate your feedback on Servlet 3.1 support.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> WBR,
>> Alexey.
>>
>> On 08/15/2012 06:55 PM, Arens, Marc wrote:
>>> Great! I'll update to the latest snapshot, see how our existing servlets
>>> like it
>>> and then look at the 3.* stuff.
>>> Thank you very much for the fast implementation.
>>>
>>> Oleksiy Stashok <oleksiy.stashok_at_oracle.com> hat am 15. August 2012 um 17:50
>>> geschrieben:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> asynchronous I/O support (Servlet 3.1) is commited as well.
>>>> Your feedback is welcome :)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> WBR,
>>>> Alexey.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/15/2012 02:39 PM, Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've commited initial Servlet 3.0-based implementation, it has to
>>>>> support asynchronous processing (including dispatch).
>>>>> The Grizzly version is 2.3-SNAPSHOT, sources could be found @ git
>>>>> branch "2.3.x".
>>>>> I'm in a process of deploying 2.3-SNAPSHOT binaries to the maven repo,
>>>>> so they have to be available soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will appreciate if you can test the implementation and provide feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> WBR,
>>>>> Alexey.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/09/2012 02:15 PM, Matthew Swift wrote:
>>>>>> On 8 August 2012 20:23, Ryan Lubke <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com
>>>>>> <mailto:ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/8/12 7:43 AM, Matthew Swift wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the status of the Servlet support in Grizzly 2.x? Is
>>>>>> it pretty stable? At the moment it seems to have a dependency
>>>>>> on Servlet 2.5 - do you plan to support Servlet 3.0 at some
>>>>>> point[1], in particular the support for asynchronous processing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What would you guys think of initial support for Servlet 3.1?
>>>>>> The 3.0 async aspect we can support for sure, but if we moved to
>>>>>> the 3.1 api, we can expose the non-blocking I/O. Is that of any
>>>>>> interest?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NIO support is something which is definitely of interest to me in the
>>>>>> long term, however in the short term I need to maintain compatibility
>>>>>> with existing J2EE 6 containers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt
>>> Best regards,
>>> Marc
> Best regards,
> Marc