Hands down and without equivocation. GIT
On Apr 8, 2011 1:25 PM, "Sebastien Dionne" <survivant00_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Git
>
> On Apr 8, 2011 1:23 PM, "Ryan Lubke" <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com> wrote:
> > Hey Folks,
> >
> > Some of you may have noticed that for several weeks we had switched over
> > to Git for Grizzly 2.0 scm services. Some of you may have *also* noticed
> > that towards the middle of this week, we started using Mercurial.
> >
> > I won't bore you with the details as to why the switch from Git to
> > Mercurial was made, however, at this point in time we now have approval
> > to use
> > what community would prefer (i.e., if the community prefers Git, then
> > that's what we'll go with or vice versa).
> >
> > My two cents on the topic:
> > - Functionally, no clear winner in my book.
> > - Tooling: I've found the mercurial plugin within Intellij to be
> > lacking
> > in some features that I enjoyed while using Git.
> > - Adoption/Growth: Git appears to have the larger portion of mindshare.
> >
> >
> > So, what would you, members of the community, prefer to use going
forward?
> >
> > [ ] Git
> > [ ] Mercurial
> >
> > Please cast your votes!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -rl
> >
> >