Technical doc:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/20081022-Grizzly-GlassFishv3.pdf
A+
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Salut,
>
> Richard Corsale wrote:
>> ok, so I have to ask :) after yesterday's webinar , I was really
>> interested to hear about gf3 embeded. It seems that for web server
>> functionality, I mean the core of the http web server were (the
>> Grizzly community) using the javax webserver and http-servlet.jar?
>> <Suggestive Statement>
>> hmm, I wonder what benefit we gain by reproducing their work in these
>> areas? I don't mean to sound like an ass. :).
>
> They are reproducing our work :-) We support embedded since day 1 of
> Grizzly :-) Another big difference is they bundle a lot more classes
> than us. As an example, the Servlet Container is just 800k where in the
> v3 embed case, 9m. That's the difference :-) They both have their nice
> IMO. If you need a full blown AppServer then v3 Embed is the choice. If
> you want to extend a simple WebServer, the Grizzly is the way to go. If
> you look at the architecture document from here (at the end), you will
> see that without grizzly Embed, there is no v3 :-)
>
>
> Im just proposing (out of total ignorance mind you :) ) that if we can
> eliminate the separate web servers (webserver-comet, webserver-cometd ..
> etc. and focus on tight integration with GF3 as the core, perhaps the
> project would be better served? We (again, by we I mean you :) ) could
> ship a solid standalone server that comes optimized for Grizzly yet
> supports J2EE standards without us having to ever think about it. I'm
> sure you could get a license at a reasonable price :).
>
> This is what we are doing with v3 already :-) We gives them all that we
> have and they build on top of it. But that doesn't mean we cannot have
> our own :-)
>
> Remember, they build on top of us :-)
>
>
>>
>> I'm using the embeded webserver for development right now and I wonder
>> about deployment issues (SX3) stability, security, scalability. Things
>> that I'm sure the GF team take into account on a daily basis
>
> Yes, but like said they "just" extend us, hence we have the same
> scalability/performance/etc. than us because v3 is "just" wrapping us :-)
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>
>> Just a thought :)
>> --Richard
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Jeanfrancois Arcand <Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_Sun.COM>
>> To: users_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2008 10:52:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: Grizzly Webserver
>>
>> Salut,
>>
>> Richard Corsale wrote:
>>> Hi All, Quick Question, does the grizzly web server use glassfish v3
>>> Embeded?
>>
>> No, it doesn't. We are working with them to make sure they are
>> offering the same sort of functionality we are offering (adding
>> AsyncFilter/Adapter) [1]
>>
>> A+
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
>> [1]
>> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/2008/07/extending_the_g.html
>>
>>
>>> --Richard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>