Hi Alexey,
Have you any example of ProtocolParser in Grizzly 2.0?
public class CustomProtocolParser extends FilterAdapter {
}
What's the different between of this compare to Grizzly 1.x's
ProtocolParser?
Regards,
Ken
Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> actually Jeanfrancois answered to you.
> I will just add, that things, you're doing right now with
> "broadcasting" could be implemented easier and on higher level (no
> need to deal with channels, keys) with Grizzly 2.0
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
> On Oct 21, 2008, at 20:43 , Ken--_at_newsgroupstats.hk wrote:
>
>>
>> Just aware that Grizzly 2.0 is built from the ground and will have a
>> more
>> user friendly api. Any pro and con for building my new application
>> with
>> Grizzly 2.0 compare to 1.x?
>>
>> my plan:
>>
>> 1. server application with ssl socket
>> 2. http engine (with jsp and servlet support) embedded. Glassfish
>> embedded?
>> 3. applet or ajax rich client
>> 4. integration with terracotta (jvm clustering)
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/bear-2.0-tp20096830p20096830.html
>> Sent from the Grizzly - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/bear-2.0-tp20096830p20224439.html
Sent from the Grizzly - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.