Hi Ken,
actually Jeanfrancois answered to you.
I will just add, that things, you're doing right now with
"broadcasting" could be implemented easier and on higher level (no
need to deal with channels, keys) with Grizzly 2.0
Thanks.
WBR,
Alexey.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 20:43 , Ken--_at_newsgroupstats.hk wrote:
>
> Just aware that Grizzly 2.0 is built from the ground and will have a
> more
> user friendly api. Any pro and con for building my new application
> with
> Grizzly 2.0 compare to 1.x?
>
> my plan:
>
> 1. server application with ssl socket
> 2. http engine (with jsp and servlet support) embedded. Glassfish
> embedded?
> 3. applet or ajax rich client
> 4. integration with terracotta (jvm clustering)
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/bear-2.0-tp20096830p20096830.html
> Sent from the Grizzly - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>