On 09/17/08 02:05 PM, Amy Roh wrote:
> Jan Luehe wrote:
>> On 09/17/08 01:19 PM, June.Parks_at_Sun.COM wrote:
>>
>>> Also, if the jkSupport property is implemented, will this JVM option
>>> still be needed?
>>>
>>> -Dcom.sun.enterprise.web.connector.enableJK=8009
>
> You don't need them both. You can enable mod-jk by either (1) using
> http-listener "jkEnabled" property or (2) using jvm option
> -Dcom.sun.enterprise.web.connector.enableJK.
Thanks, Amy, for noticing the subtle difference between "needed" and
"supported".
You're right: The option will no longer be needed, but will still be
supported. :)
Jan
>
>>
>>
>> Yes, it will still be supported, for backwards compatibility reasons.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>>
>>> June
>>>
>>> On 09/17/08 13:15, June.Parks_at_Sun.COM wrote:
>>>
>>>> Will the jkSupport property of http-listener be added to Prelude
>>>> for sure?
>
> Yes.
>
>>>> Also, Jennifer Ball said something about support for custom JARs
>>>> for mod_jk. Will this be in Prelude?
>
> I'm not sure if I follow your question, however, users do not need to
> download the tomcat-ajp.jar to enable mod-jk in v3 (it's already
> included), if that's what you're asking.
>
> Amy
>
>>>>
>>>> June
>>>>
>>>> On 09/15/08 11:57, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Salut,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope the name has no bearing here, but I am not sure. I should
>>>>>>> be able
>>>>>>> to name the JK connector as "foo", right JF?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We don't have any way to tell GF that a specific connector is
>>>>>> mod_jk enabled. Hence Amy cames with the idea (or Jan?) to have a
>>>>>> special name. For sure jdk-connector is not correct :-) It should
>>>>>> be jk-connector.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now using the name attribute might not be a good idea. I would
>>>>>> instead propose adding a property under <http-listener> with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <property name="jkSupport" value="true"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so it follow our normal convention. Jan/Amy/Kedar, what do you
>>>>>> think?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am fine with this. Maybe you should file an RFE on the admin
>>>>> console
>>>>> plugin to provide a check-box which says: < > Is this a JK Connector?
>>>>> Please document this if you intend to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>> This will make adding a JK connector easier and user does not have to
>>>>> remember the property name in its case.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kedar
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A+
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Kedar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Survivant 00 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> note sure if I'm in the right mailing-list.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I try the listener jk-mod for GF v3.. based on JF Arcand's
>>>>>>>> blog, but it doesn't work with b24. It's named jdk-connector
>>>>>>>> not jk-connector. Which one is the good name ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> here the bug issue :
>>>>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5975
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>