users@grizzly.java.net

Re: Questions about mod_jk for GF v3

From: Jan Luehe <Jan.Luehe_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:50:40 -0700

On 09/17/08 01:19 PM, June.Parks_at_Sun.COM wrote:
> Also, if the jkSupport property is implemented, will this JVM option
> still be needed?
>
> -Dcom.sun.enterprise.web.connector.enableJK=8009

Yes, it will still be supported, for backwards compatibility reasons.

Jan


>
> June
>
> On 09/17/08 13:15, June.Parks_at_Sun.COM wrote:
>> Will the jkSupport property of http-listener be added to Prelude for
>> sure?
>>
>> Also, Jennifer Ball said something about support for custom JARs for
>> mod_jk. Will this be in Prelude?
>>
>> June
>>
>> On 09/15/08 11:57, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>>> Salut,
>>>>
>>>> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>>>> I hope the name has no bearing here, but I am not sure. I should
>>>>> be able
>>>>> to name the JK connector as "foo", right JF?
>>>>
>>>> We don't have any way to tell GF that a specific connector is
>>>> mod_jk enabled. Hence Amy cames with the idea (or Jan?) to have a
>>>> special name. For sure jdk-connector is not correct :-) It should
>>>> be jk-connector.
>>>>
>>>> Now using the name attribute might not be a good idea. I would
>>>> instead propose adding a property under <http-listener> with:
>>>>
>>>> <property name="jkSupport" value="true"/>
>>>>
>>>> so it follow our normal convention. Jan/Amy/Kedar, what do you think?
>>>
>>> I am fine with this. Maybe you should file an RFE on the admin console
>>> plugin to provide a check-box which says: < > Is this a JK Connector?
>>> Please document this if you intend to do it.
>>>
>>> This will make adding a JK connector easier and user does not have to
>>> remember the property name in its case.
>>>
>>> -Kedar
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A+
>>>>
>>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kedar
>>>>>
>>>>> Survivant 00 wrote:
>>>>>> note sure if I'm in the right mailing-list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I try the listener jk-mod for GF v3.. based on JF Arcand's blog,
>>>>>> but it doesn't work with b24. It's named jdk-connector not
>>>>>> jk-connector. Which one is the good name ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> here the bug issue :
>>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5975
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>
>>
>