Would it help to rename them to;
com.sun.grizzly.org.apache.coyote and
com.sun.grizzly.org.apache.tomcat.util ?
charlie ...
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when we released Grizzly 1.5.x, we took classes from
> org.apache.coyote/tomcat to com.sun.grizzly. So far it worked well but
> it gives trouble when we:
>
> + want to port fixes from Tomcat directly (always have to find the
> associated classes)
> + breaks backward compatibility with GlassFish when Apache mod_jk is
> used, because mod_jk requires classes with org.apache.* .
>
> So I would like to rename those classes back to their original package
> so the process will be simpler. The issue I'm having is it MAY breaks
> ***a lot*** of applications that were using packages:
>
> com.sun.grizzly.util.*
>
> I don't have any better solution unfortunately. If someone has a
> better idea, please let me know.
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>