> the idea was to add the missing features to Deployer. or document
> how thoses like : ejb, env-entry, resources-entry, welcome-page,
> errors-pages ... all theses thing.
>
> so I think I'll just read the JEE5 specs for more details.
Sure. I think it could be interesting feature for Deployer!
Not sure what we can do with ejb resources, but Grizzly web container
resources, IMO, could be handled.
Thanks.
WBR,
Alexey.
>
>
>
> 2010/2/23 Oleksiy Stashok <Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com>
> Hi Sebastien,
>
>> I'm looking to bring <env-entry> <resource...> from a web.xml into
>> grizzly. I know that we don't have a jndi implementation, but I
>> want to know how that works.
>>
>> I was looking around and I saw that Jetty have there
>> implementation, Tomcat, GF... and there are few like SimpleJNDI, I
>> found OpenEJB..
>> there are look to have this similar :
>> Properties properties = new Properties();
>> properties.setProperty(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
>> "....InitialContextFactory");
>>
>>
>> initialContext = new InitialContext(properties);
>>
>> and I found this :
>>
>> All thats required is to define this jndi.properties on the classpath
>>
>> -Djava.naming.factory.initial=....
>>
>> there an article on SUN
>> http://java.sun.com/products/jndi/tutorial/beyond/env/source.html
>>
>> #1 - my Question is this:
>>
>> Why I'm lost ? There is a way to have a default JNDI handler with
>> no code involve ?
> You mean if there is a default JNDI implementation?
> I think not, remember when I needed some simple JNDI support - I
> took SimpleJNDI :)
>
>> Suppose that I want to handle all jndi type from a web.xml, is it
>> possible without implementing EJB, persistance... ?
> IMO not :) If you want to handle all types - you need to have them
> on classpath.
> But I think each container usually supports only known types, so IMO
> Grizzly shouldn't support EJB for example.
>
>> ok.. #2 - is it possible to have a JNDI for datasource and one that
>> handle EJB ?
> Theoretically you can use different JNDI implementations at the same
> time by passing different params to "new InitialContext(properties);"
>
> Can you pls. provide more details about your idea?
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -------------
>> A+
>>
>> Sébastien.
>>
>> Vous pouvez me suivre sur Twitter / You can follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/survivant
>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------
> A+
>
> Sébastien.
>
> Vous pouvez me suivre sur Twitter / You can follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/survivant