If those tests are automatable (if not, let's get 'em that way) let's
set up a hudson job so we can track it and catch things quickly.
On 2/9/10 11:05 AM, Igor Minar wrote:
> nice!
>
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> to prove that Grizzly 2.0 is not slow, I've run a small echo test.
>> I've compared Grizzly 1.9.19 (svn trunk) and Grizzly 2.0 (svn trunk)
>> configured with different strategies. The result shows that Grizzly
>> 2.0 performing better or equal to 1.9.x. The difference is more
>> significant when echoing tiny packets.
>> Here are server and client configs:
>>
>> Server:
>> numberOfCpus: 4
>> osName: SunOS 5.10 Generic_Patch_118844-30 i86pc i386 i86pc
>> numberOfSelectorThreads: 4
>> numberOfWorkerThreads: 5
>>
>> Client:
>> numberOfCpus: 2
>> numberOfThreads: 32
>> osName: Mac OS X
>>
>> I didn't use powerful machines during the test, but I think it's
>> enough to confirm that Grizzly 2.0 with all its API
>> extensions/changes is not slow.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> WBR,
>> Alexey.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/yemhry7
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>