Probably all because of Faban then...thanks!
-Scott
On 11/24/09 15:18, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Salut,
>
> Scott Oaks wrote:
>> Did a new grizzly rev get put into glassfish b73?
>
> Last integration was last Thursday 11/17, then another one on 11/19.
>
>
>>
>> We're seeing an odd thing in build 73 where tasks get rejected by the
>> SyncThreadPool because it is full. Actually, it's not that odd,
>> because the size of that pool is only 1000 in our configuration, and
>> we have 27200 connections, so the odds of there being 1000 tasks
>> actually seems fairly big to me. There's an 8 second wait time between
>> requests that average 3 seconds to execute, so we'd really expect to
>> average 1133 tasks in the queue.
>>
>> But we had the same configuration in build 72 and didn't see that
>> error, which really makes me think maybe the grizzly build in
>> glassfish 72 had an error in the task pool sizing. In v2, we would
>> size the task pool to 310000, and we thought we were doing that in v3,
>> but of course our configuration scripts are still buggy. But also we
>> changed versions of the faban driver, and it is possible that is
>> sending the load differently (and more in line with expectations).
>
> Strange.....I don't see anything changed in this are for the last month.
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>