Hi *
I've updated Deployer API:
1. Can updeploy
2. Doesn't need to support URI deployments.
Patch attached.
Still doesn't have deploy configurations.
Please comment,
Hubert.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Survivant 00 <survivant00_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll check that tomorrow and think about that. Will try to came with read
> cases that I could have.. and we will try to do something with that.
>
>
> 2009/9/17 Hubert Iwaniuk <neotyk_at_kungfoo.pl>
>
>> Hi *
>>
>>
>> Attached Deployer API proposal.
>>
>> Short description of what's in it.
>>
>> 1. New method GWS.deploy(URI, Deployer<V>) to deploy from URI using
>> deployer.
>> 2. Deployer abstract class that will deploy to GWS. Extending classes
>> need to provide implementations for:
>> 1. creating deployable object from URI
>> 2. creating map of GrizzlyAdapters to patch for them to be deployed
>> to.
>>
>> First implementation will be WarDeployer extends Deployer<WebApp> and
>> will probably
>> need to introduce additional entities for deployment configuration like
>> server wide libs and webdefaultxml.
>> But before that happening I would like to hear from you if you find this
>> API idea acceptable/usable and how it can be improved.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Hubert.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Survivant 00 <survivant00_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> it what I add in mind.
>>>
>>> GWSD should become a client of this WAA.
>>>
>>> like if we have 5 war to deploy from GWSD command line
>>>
>>> List cachedList;
>>>
>>> for(String warPath : list){
>>> WebAppAdapter w = new WebAppAdapter(warPath).deploy();
>>> cachedList.add(w);
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> something liek that
>>>
>>> and be able to do
>>>
>>> w.undeploy();
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/9/16 Jeanfrancois Arcand <Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_sun.com>
>>>
>>> Salut,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hubert Iwaniuk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi *,
>>>>>
>>>>> Excerpt from RFC Deployer Refactoring http://bit.ly/UfgUK
>>>>>
>>>>> can it be used embedded easily ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> like
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> webAdapter.deploy("xxx/webapp.war"); ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not that easy, we can create convenience method like WAA.deploy(...)
>>>>>
>>>>> So far we have:
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Default constructor, takes care of setting up adapter.
>>>>> *
>>>>> * @param gws Grizzly Web Server to register {_at_link
>>>>> ServletAdapter}s.
>>>>> * @param root Root folder, for serving static resources
>>>>> * @param context Context to be deployed to.
>>>>> * @param webApp Web application to be run by this adapter.
>>>>> * @param webAppCL Web application class loader.
>>>>> * @param webdefault Default web application.
>>>>> */
>>>>> public WebAppAdapter(GrizzlyWebServer gws, String root, String
>>>>> context, final WebApp webApp, URLClassLoader webAppCL, WebApp
>>>>> webdefault)
>>>>>
>>>>> So what it takes now for embedding is GWS, parsed WebApp, Classloader
>>>>> to be used by this WebApp, optional webdefault.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this embeddable entry method would have better place in
>>>>> GrizzlyWebServerDeployer
>>>>> We already have quite some deploy methods there.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I see WebAppAdapter is to serve welcome-file, hold information on
>>>>> what was deployed for particular WebApp (convenience for some
>>>>> management interface) and help in un/redeploying. Do you agree on
>>>>> that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Back to GWSD.deploy.
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * Deploy WAR file.
>>>>> *
>>>>> * TODO make {_at_link GrizzlyWebServer} a parameter here for easier
>>>>> embadability.
>>>>> *
>>>>> * @param location Location of WAR file.
>>>>> * @param context Context to deploy to.
>>>>> * @param serverLibLoader Server wide {_at_link ClassLoader}. Optional.
>>>>> * @param defaultWebApp webdefault application, get's merged with
>>>>> application to deploy. Optional.
>>>>> * @throws Exception Duh. TODO refactor Exception handling.
>>>>> */
>>>>> public void deployWar(
>>>>> String location, String context, URLClassLoader
>>>>> serverLibLoader, WebApp defaultWebApp) throws Exception {
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think of it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like to see WebAppAdapter.deploy(GWS,path_to_war/dir)> Mianly I
>>>> would like to be able to do something as simple as:
>>>>
>>>> WebAppAdapter w = new WebAppAdapter();
>>>> w.deploy("/foo");
>>>> gws.addGrizzlyAdapter(w);
>>>>
>>>> without the needs of the GWSD class. The idea then would consist of
>>>> moving the WebAppAdapter under the http-servlet module so people can really
>>>> embed and deploy their application programmatically.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Great work BTW!
>>>>
>>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Hubert.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Vous pouvez me suivre sur Twitter / You can follow me on Twitter :
>>> http://twitter.com/survivant
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Vous pouvez me suivre sur Twitter / You can follow me on Twitter :
> http://twitter.com/survivant
>