dev@grizzly.java.net

Re: Grizzly Servlet Container: Update and Status

From: Survivant 00 <survivant00_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:36:33 -0400

I'll check if I can find sample.



2009/9/1 Jeanfrancois Arcand <Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_sun.com>

> Salut,
>
> Hubert Iwaniuk wrote:
>
>> Yo!
>>
>> I think only Welcome file support and Support for annotation processing
>> (deployer) is blocked by GWSD refactoring.
>> Though I have no idea what "Support for annotation processing (deployer)"
>> is, could you elaborate?
>>
>
> The Servlet Spec allow some annotation to be added...we probably needs to
> process them when reading web.xml.
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>
>> Cheers,
>> Hubert.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand <
>> Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_sun.com <mailto:Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_sun.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Salut,
>>
>> wanted to gives an update on that project. Currently we are not
>> allowed to starts new project until things go back to normal
>> internally :-). We have discussed awhile ago about:
>>
>> * http://grizzly-servlet-container.dev.java.net
>>
>> It is not a big problem as we can keep the work in Grizzly like it
>> always was.
>>
>> Currently we do have significant activities with the development of
>> this component, and I would like to make sure we share the same goal
>> and continue to actively develop the baby monster :-)
>>
>> What's missing to pass the 2.5 TCKs are:
>>
>> * Support for Request Dispatcher
>> * http://is.gd/2LrUz
>> * Support for Error Page
>> * http://is.gd/2Lsmw
>> * Support for Welcome File
>> * http://is.gd/2Ls12
>> * Support for Authentication
>> * http://is.gd/2LssT
>> * Support for annotation processing (deployer)
>> * http://is.gd/2LsK1
>> * Better Session support (quite basic right now, but works)
>>
>> Hubert is working on refactoring the Deployer to allow WarAdapter
>> support, and Bongjae improved the Classloader implementation. We
>> also need to work on a high level API that allow pluggable deployer
>> (should be simple).
>>
>> We should try to dispatch amongst us the workload (and see if
>> external users want to contribute as well). I would recommend we
>> continue developing those modules on 1.9.x, and port the work on
>> 2.0.0 M4 later.
>>
>> What peoples think? Anybody interested to contribute please ping me
>> directly at jfarcand at apache dot org and I will gives you commit
>> access to that module.
>>
>> Thanks!!!
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> <mailto:users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net>
>>
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>