Hi Gustav,
>
> how urgent is this , is tomorrow ok ?.
Well, if you don't have time today - it's fine. But, IMHO, it's
priority 1 issue, as we need to have that fixed before 1.9.5 release.
WBR,
Alexey.
>
>
> 2009/1/21 gustav trede <gustav.trede_at_gmail.com>
>
> I will see what other projects do about this situation.
>
> 2009/1/21 Oleksiy Stashok <Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com>
>
> Think it's not OSGi problem, but we can not use sun internal
> packages at all.
> Gustav, can you pls. take a look at that?
> I'm not sure what Unsafe is used for, looks like it is used to
> change "final" Class members. We can try to remove the dependancy by
> removing "final" declaration and the check if it still performs good
> with our testcases.
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2009, at 10:24 , Hubert Iwaniuk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since introduction of LinkedTransferQueue we have problems with OSGi
> packaging.
> LTQ depends on sun.misc.Unsafe and sun.misc is not provided by any
> bundle, so trying to provision OSGi bundle will fail.
> Trying to figure out how to get this package visible in OSGi
> environment.
>
> Any help is appreciated,
> Hubert.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>
>
>
> --
> your servant
> gustav trede
>
> coding is art - not only something that bring food on the table,
> everybody should be able to feel proud about their code,
> that they have performed their best considering the given conditions.
>
>
>
>
> --
> your servant
> gustav trede
>
> coding is art - not only something that bring food on the table,
> everybody should be able to feel proud about their code,
> that they have performed their best considering the given conditions.
>