Salut,
David M. Lloyd wrote:
> On 06/13/2008 11:54 AM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>> Salut,
>>
>> hope you are doing well (saw you mail on mina list).
>>
>> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>> Not exactly... Sorry for the bad first analysis !
>>
>> Actually is it quite close to NIO.2 (almost a copy....)...Now JBoss
>> has 2 NIO frameworks: Netty and that one...
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>
> You are both incorrect :-)
>
> XNIO is not an NIO framework; it is an NIO *replacement*, designed to
> eliminate the "bad stuff" in NIO like Selectors but keep the "good
> stuff" like Channels, without imposing significant additional overhead.
> The default implementation uses NIO.1 under the covers, but an APR-based
> provider is in the works. There are other good features as well, but I
> won't pollute the Grizzly list with advertisements for my own project
> (too late?).
Naaa you don't pollute. Feel free to send us more information. Might
want to evaluate if we can run on top of your stuff :-) :-)
>
> I won't go into the differences between Netty and XNIO, but suffice to
> say that Netty is not an "NIO framework" either; rather it's a codec
> framework, which uses NIO (or alternately, XNIO) as a lower transport
> layer.
Netty support XNIO? Or it is planned?
>
> Hope this clarifies things. I'm always willing to answer questions -
> contact me at the above email address or in the #jboss or ##java channel
> on irc.freenode.net.
Or here :-)
A+
-- Jeanfrancois
>
> - DML
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>