Hi,
after our weekly meeting this week, I just want to clarify the current
email as it mixes two topics, like Ken reported :-)
+ We gonna create a 2.0 branch for innovation (our Sandbox)
+ I will start working on NIO.2 integration. We gonna decide later on
which branch we want to see the development: on the trunk, on the 2.0 or
on its own branch :-)
A+
-- Jeanfrancois
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new branch for our upcoming Grizzly2.0 works.
> For the next couple of month, I would like to allow full innovation on
> that branch with no restriction (no backward compatibility requirement,
> new features, contributions, new ideas, etc.). Innovation added to that
> branch can possibly be ported back to the 1.x branch, but It should be
> case by case. Then once we think we have something we want to officially
> release Grizzly2.0 release, we can then decide what to do with backward
> compatibility, etc.
>
> Personally I would like to start experimenting with NIO.2 on that branch.
>
> What people thinks?
>
> Thanks
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>