Hi,
You can follow the discussion here:
http://www.nabble.com/grizzly-versus-mina-tf3810989.html
Just skip the Apache whining game against SUN (keep popping once and a
while)....
-- Jeanfrancois
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: grizzly versus mina
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:45:01 -0400
> From: Adam Fisk <adamfisk_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: dev_at_mina.apache.org
> To: dev_at_mina.apache.org
>
> The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly
> blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's views
> on it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector
> threading and ByteBuffer use.
>
> http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-2992&yr=2007&track=5
>
>
> Maybe someone could comment on the performance improvements in MINA
> 2.0? It
> might also be useful to look at Grizzlies techniques to see if MINA could
> incorporate them. I know at least Scott Oaks from Grizzly is a solid
> performance guy, so their numbers are likely correct.
>
> Quick note: I'm not trying to spark a Grizzly/MINA battle by any means. I
> just started using MINA after having implemented several generic NIO
> frameworks myself, and I absolutely love MINA's approach. It allowed me to
> code a STUN server in 2 days, and I'm porting my SIP server now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>