-------- Original Message --------
Subject: grizzly versus mina
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:45:01 -0400
From: Adam Fisk <adamfisk_at_gmail.com>
Reply-To: dev_at_mina.apache.org
To: dev_at_mina.apache.org
The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly
blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's views
on it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector
threading and ByteBuffer use.
http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-2992&yr=2007&track=5
Maybe someone could comment on the performance improvements in MINA 2.0? It
might also be useful to look at Grizzlies techniques to see if MINA could
incorporate them. I know at least Scott Oaks from Grizzly is a solid
performance guy, so their numbers are likely correct.
Quick note: I'm not trying to spark a Grizzly/MINA battle by any means. I
just started using MINA after having implemented several generic NIO
frameworks myself, and I absolutely love MINA's approach. It allowed me to
code a STUN server in 2 days, and I'm porting my SIP server now.
Thanks,
Adam