users@glassfish.java.net
Re: GF4 complains about CDI failures, but I do not use CDI ...
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Maybe in reply to
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: <
forums_at_java.net
>
Date
: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:40:34 -0500 (CDT)
beans.xml is optional in CDI 1.1. Archives may be treated as bean archives
implicitly if scope annotations are present. See
https://java.net/projects/glassfish/lists/users/archive/2013-05/message/15
for a similar case. Best regards, Harald
-- [Message sent by forum member 'hwellmann'] View Post:
http://forums.java.net/node/898688
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
forums_at_java.net: "Re: GF4 complains about CDI failures, but I do not use CDI ..."
Previous message
:
Oliver B. Fischer: "Re: Dependency management and embedded Glassfish"
Maybe in reply to
:
Romain Grecourt: "Re: GF4 complains about CDI failures, but I do not use CDI ..."
Reply
:
forums_at_java.net: "Re: GF4 complains about CDI failures, but I do not use CDI ..."
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]