It shouldn't as we use localhost in our domain configuration. A quick
grep of your actual hostname under
expanded files(particularly domain.xml) will confirm that.
Thanks
Sathyan
On 2/23/12 12:58 PM, Eve Pokua wrote:
> The PC has now been formatted. If the name is changed, would it cause any problems to the old glassfish installation, of copied back to its original dir?
>
> EVE'S iPhone
>
> On 23 Feb 2012, at 17:23, "Sathyan Catari"<Sathyan.Catari_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes it should. May be a silly question, but worth asking. Did you stop all the GlassFish related
>> processes prior to doing the backup to make sure that there were no open/locked files?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sathyan
>>
>>
>> On 2/23/12 8:56 AM, Eve Pokua wrote:
>>> The PC is not yet formatted. So I can copy / cut the dir back where it was and everything should work as usual?
>>>
>>> EVE'S iPhone
>>>
>>> On 23 Feb 2012, at 07:02, "Sathyan Catari"<Sathyan.Catari_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/22/12 10:09 PM, Eve Pokua wrote:
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I had glassfish 2.1 installed and also 3.0.1 and 3.1.1 installed. I am on the process of formatting my PC as I have issues with the PC. I ave backed up my files including glassfish directories, by cutting files across to another drive. I can't remember but I think there was some complaints that some files name length was too long to be copied. But then after I checked, there was no files left behind. So i assumed every was copied across.
>>>> If you haven't formatted your PC, then can you do a quick validation of the zip archives by unzipping them in new install directories?
>>>>> So, what is best practice?
>>>> Backup/Restore would just work fine as long as the followings are taken care of
>>>> -No embedded paths in Domain configuration(ex. reference to libraries outside of GF install)
>>>> -No Windows services are created
>>>>> Copy the glassfish directories back again or download and install fresh ones? I like to keep up to date with fixes and that. For the 2.1, I ave a cluster of it on another PC. I suspect I still need the 2.1 as I ave applications I ave developed with ejb and persistent one / 2, before ejb3 and persistent 3, new development. And so I ave not change the programming codes.
>>>> Java EE backward compatibilities are guaranteed.
>>>>> Any comments appreciated. Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> EVE