users@glassfish.java.net

Re: skinnyfish - Trimming down for production

From: Alexis Moussine-Pouchkine <alexis.moussine-pouchkine_at_oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:01:47 +0100

Given the load-on-demand architecture of GlassFish I'd say it's a stretch to call it bloated.
Trimming down GlassFish is really useful for environments that have limited memory and disk.
-Alexis

On 11 févr. 2012, at 05:38, forums_at_java.net wrote:

> I am suprised that Tom's advice was condemed without some advice that is
> acceptable.
>
> So, then am I to understand that the best practice for production is to use a
> bloated default install?
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> [Message sent by forum member 'inetdanno']
>
> View Post: http://forums.java.net/node/883368
>
>