For sdoca, seems that it would be easier to setup, but in my environment, I
have also producers and MDBs inside the same ear.
I wouldn't like to make them access a remote JMS server, because I assume
local JMS "operations" would be much more efficient than remote JMS.
Am I right?
BR,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gustavo Henrique Orair
Mestre em Ciência da Computação - MSc in Computer Science
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Celular/Cell phone: 55-31-85157887
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011/12/2 <forums_at_java.net>
> What about thinking of the Message Queue like a separate, shared service
> ...
> like you would having an IBM MQ Series ...
>
> Set up an OpenMQ service, which can be used by all of your instance.
>
> In domain/instance config, configure the JMS type to be 'remote' so that GF
> does not either embed the MQ or fork it.
>
> Setup OpenMQ and within each domain configure the jms-resource to point to
> the OpenMQ service using the 'addressList' property.
>
> -Bernhard
>
>
> --
>
> [Message sent by forum member 'bthalmayr']
>
> View Post: http://forums.java.net/node/**869999<http://forums.java.net/node/869999>
>
>
>