> Hi Nigel,
>
> I managed to partly resolved this issue by creating
> the CustomerProducer Application Client within an EAR
> project with little or no use of EJB subproject. A
> natural question that follows would be to ask whether
> this requirement (access connection factory from an
> application client only project) is part of the Java
> EE 5 design, or am I still missing something?
>
> Both
> <INSTALL>/javaeetutorial5/examples/jms/simple/producer
> &
> <INSTALL>/javaeetutorial5/examples/jms/simple/synchcon
> sumer certainly work on its own but I am not sure
> whether it was created as an application client
> especially in Netbeans 6.7 which is what I have used
> to create all projects?
We need an expert in the application client to answer these (good) questions.
>
> Lastly, can I confirm that a standalone client would
> have been able to achieve the same objective (sending
> object as JMS message to a remote glassfish server)
> but without transaction guarantee (re-transmission
> until a proper acknowledgement of message being
> receipted before deleting the source message)?
>
All types of client can use transactions, or not, as you require.
Nigel
[Message sent by forum member 'nigeldeakin']
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=392718