Hi,
On my GlassFish installation, I just mapped GlassFish to use the 80 and
443 port for HTTP(S) connectors. But I see a lot of people recommending
to use mod_jk with a front-end HTTP server.
My question is what are the difference between using mod_jk and mapping
GlassFish directly to post 80. Are they security / performance issues ?
Regards,
Vivien Barousse
Serge Fonville wrote:
> Google for glassfish virtual servers or for mod_jk glassfish
>
> HTH
>
> Regards,
>
> Serge Fonville
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Hu Zhang<huzhang1982_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your suggestion, but it seems that these two port numbers have
>> already been used.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Derek Sceats <dsceats_at_silasg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> One option is to front-end with a web server as a reverse proxy, then you
>>> can map port 80 or 443 to ports 8080 and 8181 on your current Glassfish
>>> deployments. This would eliminate having to type in these port numbers.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Derek
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hu Zhang [mailto:huzhang1982_at_gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Fri 7/17/2009 12:23 PM
>>> To: users_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> Subject: How to eliminate port number?
>>>
>>> I used virtual server to host two DNS (http://www.aaa.com and
>>> http://www.bbb.com) on one physical server. But when accessing them, I
>>> have
>>> to specify the port number. (http://www.aaa.com:8080,
>>> http://www.bbb.com:8181) How can I get rid of the port number?
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>