Are #1 & #2 not addressed by OSGi metadata?
With regards to #3, the environment is specific to the EJB and not its
client. So, I don't see any problems.
Sahoo
Miroslav Nachev wrote:
> Hi Sahoo,
>
> The possibility to pack one EJB in single OSGi Bundle is great. Now I
> would like to ask you regarding the following scenarios followed from
> OSGi specification:
> 1. How one application will determine which Bundle/EJB to use in case
> that there are two or more bundles which implements the same interface?
> 2. The 2nd question is related with the 1st but there is one more
> constraint: only the bundle version is different.
> 3. In case that 2 or more applications depends from one Bundle/EJB how
> their application specific environment will be provided? What about
> the Security model?
>
>
> Regards,
> Miro.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Miroslav Nachev <miro_at_space-comm.com
> <mailto:miro_at_space-comm.com>> wrote:
>
> This is GREAT. I love GF v3.
>
>
> Miro.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Sahoo <Sahoo_at_sun.com
> <mailto:Sahoo_at_sun.com>> wrote:
>
> Miro,
>
> This is a planned feature in GlassFish v3. It is not yet
> implemented, but work has started. You can find details about
> the proposed feature here:
>
> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/attach/V3FunctionalSpecs/GFv3-OSGi-onepager-v0.3.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
> - Show quoted text -
>
>
> Miroslav Nachev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible under GlassFish v3 to represent one or more
> EJBs like single OSGi Bundle?
>
>
> Regards,
> Miro.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>
>
>