users@glassfish.java.net

Re: Jsr199JavaCompiler possible memory leak?

From: Jan Luehe <Jan.Luehe_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:09:08 -0800

Hi Dominic,

On 01/14/09 16:01, Dominic McGinnis wrote:
> On this note is the JSR199 in-memory compiler used as the default
> compiler for v2ur2 using JDK 1.6?
Yes.
> From my understanding that appears to be the case, but I'm having
> trouble finding any documentation that states this as a fact.
>
> Also if so, how does one bypass this and fall back to using the non
> in-memory compiler?

I don't think there is any way to fall back to the ant-based compiler
when using JDK 1.6,
but I will let Kin-man confirm.

Thanks!

Jan

>
> Thanks,
> Dominic
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* "glassfish_at_javadesktop.org" <glassfish_at_javadesktop.org>
> *To:* users_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:14:26 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Jsr199JavaCompiler possible memory leak?
>
> No worries, glad to help.
> [Message sent by forum member 'finbarro' (finbarro)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=326074
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>
>