On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Jacob Kessler <Jacob.Kessler_at_sun.com> wrote:
> To me, it seems like if both are provided, the rackupScript should be
> overridden, since the rackup script would implicitly include the application
> type (since it would have to start the framework on its own). It's possible
> that we could merge them into a single option, with options as "merb",
> "rails", or a path to a rackup script. Would that remove the potential
> ambiguity and be better?
Whatever makes sense to you is fine; it was really just the 2 options that threw
me a little. Thanks!