The GF v2 ur1 release for AIX has been tested with IBM's 32 bit VM on
the 64 bit os (version 5.2 and 5.3) . We do extensive testing before we
release covering a wide gamut from configuration, deployment, web
services, etc to clustering and in-memory replication.
Could you try running with the 32 bit vm and get back to us on your
experience ? Is there a specific reason why you would need the 64 bit
address space? Are you running a memory intensive application requiring
the extra heap space?
Since we have not tested or certified GF v2 ur1 for 64 bit JVM it
possible that there are issues to be resolved.
Thanks
Shreedhar
glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
> Been using Oracle's product but it is not certified to run against 64-bit JDKs and appears to break when we performed some experiments. Also has good clustering features, etc. Short story is that after installing V2 URI and deploying our apps we found no problems in some information testing however we did find some problems with the console after logging in and deploying our apps I clicked home and got a servlet exception for the component tree on the left hand side of the screen. Everyone other time home work and when it didn't got the HTTP 500 servlet exception. Needless to say we immediately lost some confidence in the product. So two questions, after trying to search for any bugs and sorry getting the stacktrace off the machine is a hassle for security reasons, 1) has anyone seen anything like this and 2) how stable is gf?
> [Message sent by forum member 'pmcallahanjr' (pmcallahanjr)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=255685
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>