users@glassfish.java.net
Re: Two entity classes mapped to same table
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: <
glassfish_at_javadesktop.org
>
Date
: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:29:23 PDT
I'd go for using a "monolithic" entity. There shouldn't be a performance penalty.
[Message sent by forum member 'mf125085' (mf125085)]
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=217920
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
glassfish_at_javadesktop.org: "Re: Two entity classes mapped to same table"
Previous message
:
Suresh Potiny: "Re: JBI OpenESB components location"
In reply to
:
glassfish_at_javadesktop.org: "Re: Two entity classes mapped to same table"
Next in thread
:
glassfish_at_javadesktop.org: "Re: Two entity classes mapped to same table"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]