Hi Cameron,
Bug 879 should be easy to fix once issue 1597 is resolved. I hope issue
1597 will be done soon, and I'm intending to work on issue 879 after
that. As there actually is a workaround (although ugly) higher priority
issues might have priority, though.
Best,
-- markus.
glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have just run into Bug 1120 https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1120 which lead me to Bug 879 https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=879
>
> Is there any news on the progess of 879? It has been open for 9 months and causes a violation of the persistence spec when applied to the OneToMany cascade delete scenario.
>
> As outlined in 1120, the workaround, was to rename (or in our case, move the package) the owned Entity.
>
> This took quite some time to track down and seems like a fairly clear cut problem to fix for OneToMany relationships (not ManyToMany as 879 references).
>
> Could someone please provide an update on 879?
> Thanks
> Cameron
> [Message sent by forum member 'cameronr' (cameronr)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=213302
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>