users@glassfish.java.net

Re: _at_WebServiceProvider and the servlet-name

From: Dhiru Pandey <Dhiru.Pandey_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:20:37 -0800

If you are not using a deployment descriptor (webservices.xml) file then
this is true.

Please see section 5.3.2.2 on WebServiceProvider annotation (JSR-109):

"For Servlet based endpoints using this annotation, fully qualified name
of the Service Implementation Bean class
must be used as the <servlet-link> element in the deployment descriptor
to map the Port component to the actual
Servlet."

This implies that the servlet name (which is the same as the
<servlet-link>) should be fully qualified name of the Service
Implementation Bean class

You should be able to override this if the webservices.xml file is used

-Dhiru

Mark Hansen wrote:
> It seems to be a requirement in GlassFish that when deploying an
> @WebServiceProvider along with an web.xml, that the <servlet-name>
> must be equal to the fully qualified name of the provider class (i.e.,
> the class with the @WebServiceProvider annotation). Is that correct?
> Is this a requirement specified anywhere in JSR-109 or JSR-181,
> because if it is, I cannot find such a requirement.
>
> Thanks for any insight on this.
>
> -- Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>