"Hope this answer your questions.", yes, very clear from Fish to CATs. So
impressed. Thanks Anissa !
Judy
Anissa Lam wrote:
> Hi Wu Jie,
> Thanks for trying out this functionality in GUI. Please see comments
> inline.
>
> Wu Jie wrote:
>> Hi Judy
>>
>> When I edited the Pool Settings I found sth strange following.
>>
>> 1.About default value of Pool Settings in EJB setting
>> The original Pool Settings in GUI are following.
>> =====================================
>> Initial and Minimum Pool Size: 0
>> Maximum Pool Size: 32
>> Pool Resize Quantity: 8
>> =====================================
>>
>> When I click [Load Defaults] button, the setting changed as below.
>> =====================================
>> Initial and Minimum Pool Size: 16
>> Maximum Pool Size: 64
>> Pool Resize Quantity: 16
>> =====================================
>>
>> The style above shows that the original values are different
>> from default values of pool settings. Why?
> Looks like the pool settings for the ejb container in the domain
> template is different than the default value. Please file a bug agains
> "ejb" so the team can take a look and decide if thats by design or
> just overlook.
>
>> I found the styles of pool seetings of MDB and EJB are the same.
>> but they are different from the following settings
>> ・EJB Cache Setting,
>> ・JDBC Connection Pool
>> ・Connectot Connection Pool
>> The original value and default value of the three settings above
>> are the same.
>>
>> I think it is better to unify the design of the settings above.
>>
> Agree, Please also mention this in the bug report. thanks
>> 2.About the contents of domain.xml
>> When use default value for Pool Settings, the setting value is
>> not written in the domain.xml. Why?
>>
>>
> In v3, default values are no longer written out in domain.xml. This
> helps trimming the domain.xml tremendously and make it more 'readable'
> if one decides to look at that. Here is also another reason that
> Jerome gave back in Aug 2008 when this was implemented.
>
> /"the main problem with writing out the default value in the
> domain.xml is that if we decide that the default value should be
> changed between releases *and* we are dealing with an upgrade scenario
> then the user would retain the previous default value which was
> clearly not his intent."
> /
> Hope this answer your questions.
> thanks
> anissa
>> Thanks
>> -Wu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net For
> additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net