Hi Shaline,
Thanks for the help here. That explains why mod_jk all of a sudden
started working. It was because I deployed a web app and then did the
command in your step 3. I guess your steps 1 and 2 can be done the other
way around.
Many thanks for getting back to me on this!
Wouter
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:59:31AM -0700, shaline gowda wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
> You have to follow the below steps , to see port 8009 being used after you
> configure mod_jk:
> In Step 4 : in the below blog: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/amyroh/archive/
> 2009/06/running_glassfi.html
> After you install GFV3 and start domain1, you have to :
> 1) deploy a webapp to start the webcontainer.
> 2) asadmin create-http-listener --listenerport 8009 --listeneraddress 0.0.0.0
> --defaultvs server my-connector
>
> 3)asadmin set
> configs.config.server-config.network-config.network-listeners.network-listener.jk-connector.jk-enabled
> =true
> 4) stop domain1
> 5) start domain1
>
> Now if you issue URL : Ex: http://hostname:80 will be forwarded to GF.
> You can see that port 8009 being used when you do netstat.
>
> Thank you
> Shaline.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> + /export/hudson/workspace/quicklook-on-mod_jk-config/jdk/jdk1.6.0_14/label/jws-cust-280-3.sfbay.sun.com/glassfish-v3-image/glassfishv3/glassfish/bin/asadmin start-domain domain1
>
>
>
> Waiting for DAS to start.
>
>
>
> --
> Wouter van Reeven wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Today I found this web log article
>
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/amyroh/archive/2009/06/running_glassfi.html
>
> about running Apache2 and GlassFish v3 and using mod_jk to manage the
> communication between Apache and GF. I followed the steps in the article
> and found that no port 8009 is used when I execute the commands
>
> asadmin create-http-listener --listenerport 8009 --listeneraddress 0.0.0.0 --defaultvs server jk-connector
> asadmin set configs.config.server-config.network-config.network-listeners.network-listener.jk-connector.jk-enabled=true
>
> even when I make sure that the connector in the second command (jk-connector)
> is the same as in the first command (it is wrong in the article).
>
> However, I reinstalled GFv3 (build 57) and then omitted the second
> command. Now port 8009 is used as I can show with a netstat command. Is
> this the intended behaviour?
>
> Next steps are to test if I can run any application using port 80
> through Apache instead of using port 8080 and running it on GF directly.
>
>
> Wouter
>
>
>
>
--
Gravity brings me down
[Unknown Source]
Skype: wvreeven
Facebook: wvreeven
Twitter: wvreeven