Hi Kraemer,
Thanks your reply very much. Response in-line, below....
> Which version of GF are you using?
GF V2.1 b60 cluster profile.
>
> I would assume there is some other entry in the server.policy file that
> is granting the necessary permissions.
Kraemer, I also think so,and I try finding these entries,but I did not get my expected result.
Maybe my knowledge on 'SM' is not well.
> What is the full path to:
>
> 1. asadmin
> 2. your spring.jar
>
> My guess is that you put spring.jar in the installRoot, not the
> instanceRoot.
I have placed the spring.jar into the instanceRoot, rather than installRoot.
I know that the app can have access to the jar in the installRoot/lib.
Best Regard!
--Mike Tang
>
> thanks,
> vbk
>
> Tang Yong wrote:
>> Hi Kraemer,
>>
>> I am sorry for interupting your work again.
>>
>> According your reply, I do some investigating on the 'SM' and try the spring web sample again.
>>
>> The result is as following:
>> 1 Because my GF's profile is cluster(not enterprise profile), by default, 'SM' is disabled.
>> So, I turned on the 'SM' by means of "asadmin create-jvm-options --user admin -Djava.security.manager",
>> Then, I restarted the GF. (The above config info is from "GF Enterprise Server 2.1 Developer's Guide".
>> 2 I redeployed the spring web sample.
>> 3 Running is still well.
>>
>> Although the result displayed that Kraemer's "Probably", I have a problem related the result:
>>
>> When I have seen the server.policy file, I did not find the sentence related "grant codeBase "file:${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/lib/-" {
>> permission java.security.AllPermission;
>> };"
>> BTW: my spring.jar is placed in the "${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/lib/" which is valid for the whole domain.
>>
>> So, I want to know why spring.jar has been granted?
>>
>> Regard!
>>
>> --Mike Tang.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Response in-line, below....
>>>
>>> vbk
>>>
>>> Tang Yong wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Kraemer,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your reply, and I indeedly expected your reply.
>>>>
>>>> Your explaination is very detailed and I have knowed a lot.
>>>>
>>>> However, due to my poor English, I want to confirm my understanding with you:
>>>>
>>>> 1 Whether or not glassfish version changed, if I turn on the 'SM', I will run into
>>>> the similar issues related 'SM'.
>>>> (BTW: I will try it.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I can only say, "Probably". I haven't tried it for a long time (in terms
>>> of software 'years')
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2 For current glassfish version, 'SM' is disabled by default.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Kraemer, I have a suggestion:
>>>> Although the blog is not a formal document, I (we) still believe/respect the sun's blog.(:).
>>>> However, I wish that to some blog's content, you/experts can update the content a litter.
>>>> Even adding some more valuable materials.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hmm... I have to disagree with you on this... Blogs are 'stuff I
>>> learned... that I am sharing with you'. The power of a blog comes from
>>> others (like yourself) doing the same.. learning something and then
>>> sharing it, via a blog (or e-mail list or social network or...)
>>>
>>> You see, I WAS an expert on this topic... at that time... since I was
>>> working on it actively. At this point, you are the expert... not me...
>>> since YOU are working actively in this area.
>>>
>>> By sharing what you know, NOW, you will spur others to make their own
>>> discoveries and publish them... to the benefit of all of us.
>>>
>>> vbk
>>>
>>>
>>>> In addition, Spring on GF is an important topic, if you know the weblogic ejb container implementation(using pitchfork).
>>>> Because Spring on GF may be let us make more valuable decisions in designing mission-critical enterprise app.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again!
>>>>
>>>> Best Regard!
>>>>
>>>> --Mike Tang, MiddleWare Developer,From Fujitsu China
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem that you are referring to was due to the fact that the
>>>>> Security manager was enabled by default when the blog entries were
>>>>> written. The default state (on or off) of the SM was changed very early
>>>>> in the v1 development cycle... (to OFF)... due to the errors that Matt
>>>>> and Jerome encountered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: if the 'turn on the SM' you will run into issues similar to those
>>>>> discussed in the blogs entries...
>>>>>
>>>>> Since blogs are not 'documentation' in the formal sense, you have to
>>>>> consider their age as you read their content.
>>>>>
>>>>> The blog entries you cite were about experiences with a server that
>>>>> existed a couple years ago... that was changing on a daily basis...
>>>>>
>>>>> that said, I am gald to hear that you are making progress with Spring on GF.
>>>>>
>>>>> vbk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>