Response in-line, below....
vbk
Tang Yong wrote:
> Hi Kraemer,
>
> Thanks for your reply, and I indeedly expected your reply.
>
> Your explaination is very detailed and I have knowed a lot.
>
> However, due to my poor English, I want to confirm my understanding with you:
>
> 1 Whether or not glassfish version changed, if I turn on the 'SM', I will run into
> the similar issues related 'SM'.
> (BTW: I will try it.)
>
I can only say, "Probably". I haven't tried it for a long time (in terms
of software 'years')
> 2 For current glassfish version, 'SM' is disabled by default.
>
Yes.
> Kraemer, I have a suggestion:
> Although the blog is not a formal document, I (we) still believe/respect the sun's blog.(:).
> However, I wish that to some blog's content, you/experts can update the content a litter.
> Even adding some more valuable materials.
>
Hmm... I have to disagree with you on this... Blogs are 'stuff I
learned... that I am sharing with you'. The power of a blog comes from
others (like yourself) doing the same.. learning something and then
sharing it, via a blog (or e-mail list or social network or...)
You see, I WAS an expert on this topic... at that time... since I was
working on it actively. At this point, you are the expert... not me...
since YOU are working actively in this area.
By sharing what you know, NOW, you will spur others to make their own
discoveries and publish them... to the benefit of all of us.
vbk
> In addition, Spring on GF is an important topic, if you know the weblogic ejb container implementation(using pitchfork).
> Because Spring on GF may be let us make more valuable decisions in designing mission-critical enterprise app.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Best Regard!
>
> --Mike Tang, MiddleWare Developer,From Fujitsu China
>
>
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> The problem that you are referring to was due to the fact that the
>> Security manager was enabled by default when the blog entries were
>> written. The default state (on or off) of the SM was changed very early
>> in the v1 development cycle... (to OFF)... due to the errors that Matt
>> and Jerome encountered.
>>
>> Note: if the 'turn on the SM' you will run into issues similar to those
>> discussed in the blogs entries...
>>
>> Since blogs are not 'documentation' in the formal sense, you have to
>> consider their age as you read their content.
>>
>> The blog entries you cite were about experiences with a server that
>> existed a couple years ago... that was changing on a daily basis...
>>
>> that said, I am gald to hear that you are making progress with Spring on GF.
>>
>> vbk
>>
>> Judy Tang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the clarify. I got you. Let's wait for some time for others
>>> to jump in.
>>>
>>> Judy
>>>
>>> Tang Yong wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Judy,
>>>>
>>>> Reply is late and I am sorry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if you know the bug
>>>>> id or can give us what kind error you see, so we know how to help you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Judy, I find the problem related SecurityManagement by means of
>>>> Matt's blog(http://jroller.com/page/raible?entry=why_glassfish_isn_t_as).
>>>>
>>>> Vkraemer also knowed the problem.
>>>>
>>>> I want to confirm the problem in Glassfish V2.1, but I have not found the
>>>> problem. So I make the two conclusions:
>>>> 1) whether I understood the problem incorrectly?
>>>> 2) the problem is fixed in Glassfish V xxx?
>>>>
>>>> To be regret, I can not give you more info.
>>>>
>>>> Regards!
>>>>
>>>> --Mike Tang.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>
>>