Hi Kraemer,
I am sorry for interupting your work again.
According your reply, I do some investigating on the 'SM' and try the spring web sample again.
The result is as following:
1 Because my GF's profile is cluster(not enterprise profile), by default, 'SM' is disabled.
So, I turned on the 'SM' by means of "asadmin create-jvm-options --user admin -Djava.security.manager",
Then, I restarted the GF. (The above config info is from "GF Enterprise Server 2.1 Developer's Guide".
2 I redeployed the spring web sample.
3 Running is still well.
Although the result displayed that Kraemer's "Probably", I have a problem related the result:
When I have seen the server.policy file, I did not find the sentence related "grant codeBase "file:${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/lib/-" {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};"
BTW: my spring.jar is placed in the "${com.sun.aas.instanceRoot}/lib/" which is valid for the whole domain.
So, I want to know why spring.jar has been granted?
Regard!
--Mike Tang.
> Response in-line, below....
>
> vbk
>
> Tang Yong wrote:
>> Hi Kraemer,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply, and I indeedly expected your reply.
>>
>> Your explaination is very detailed and I have knowed a lot.
>>
>> However, due to my poor English, I want to confirm my understanding with you:
>>
>> 1 Whether or not glassfish version changed, if I turn on the 'SM', I will run into
>> the similar issues related 'SM'.
>> (BTW: I will try it.)
>>
>
> I can only say, "Probably". I haven't tried it for a long time (in terms
> of software 'years')
>
>> 2 For current glassfish version, 'SM' is disabled by default.
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>> Kraemer, I have a suggestion:
>> Although the blog is not a formal document, I (we) still believe/respect the sun's blog.(:).
>> However, I wish that to some blog's content, you/experts can update the content a litter.
>> Even adding some more valuable materials.
>>
>
> Hmm... I have to disagree with you on this... Blogs are 'stuff I
> learned... that I am sharing with you'. The power of a blog comes from
> others (like yourself) doing the same.. learning something and then
> sharing it, via a blog (or e-mail list or social network or...)
>
> You see, I WAS an expert on this topic... at that time... since I was
> working on it actively. At this point, you are the expert... not me...
> since YOU are working actively in this area.
>
> By sharing what you know, NOW, you will spur others to make their own
> discoveries and publish them... to the benefit of all of us.
>
> vbk
>
>> In addition, Spring on GF is an important topic, if you know the weblogic ejb container implementation(using pitchfork).
>> Because Spring on GF may be let us make more valuable decisions in designing mission-critical enterprise app.
>>
>> Thanks again!
>>
>> Best Regard!
>>
>> --Mike Tang, MiddleWare Developer,From Fujitsu China
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> The problem that you are referring to was due to the fact that the
>>> Security manager was enabled by default when the blog entries were
>>> written. The default state (on or off) of the SM was changed very early
>>> in the v1 development cycle... (to OFF)... due to the errors that Matt
>>> and Jerome encountered.
>>>
>>> Note: if the 'turn on the SM' you will run into issues similar to those
>>> discussed in the blogs entries...
>>>
>>> Since blogs are not 'documentation' in the formal sense, you have to
>>> consider their age as you read their content.
>>>
>>> The blog entries you cite were about experiences with a server that
>>> existed a couple years ago... that was changing on a daily basis...
>>>
>>> that said, I am gald to hear that you are making progress with Spring on GF.
>>>
>>> vbk
>>>
>>> Judy Tang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the clarify. I got you. Let's wait for some time for others
>>>> to jump in.
>>>>
>>>> Judy
>>>>
>>>> Tang Yong wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Judy,
>>>>>
>>>>> Reply is late and I am sorry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if you know the bug
>>>>>> id or can give us what kind error you see, so we know how to help you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Judy, I find the problem related SecurityManagement by means of
>>>>> Matt's blog(http://jroller.com/page/raible?entry=why_glassfish_isn_t_as).
>>>>>
>>>>> Vkraemer also knowed the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to confirm the problem in Glassfish V2.1, but I have not found the
>>>>> problem. So I make the two conclusions:
>>>>> 1) whether I understood the problem incorrectly?
>>>>> 2) the problem is fixed in Glassfish V xxx?
>>>>>
>>>>> To be regret, I can not give you more info.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards!
>>>>>
>>>>> --Mike Tang.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>