quality@glassfish.java.net

Re: gfv3-b33: updatetool?

From: Terena Chinn-Fujii <Terena.Chinnfujii_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:29:01 -0800

Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
> This would mean that one or both instances of
> pkg.glassfish.org/v3/contrib/solaris-x86 repository is down
> (presumably only one since I can get URL rendered in my browser)....
>
> Terena, could you please check the status of this particular repository?

Snjezana,

I restarted the repo instances on both zones so hopefully this will
resolve the issue.


Terena

>
> Thanks,
>
> Snjezana
>
> Kristian Rink wrote:
>
>> Hi all;
>>
>> some research on the 404 while trying to install updatetool: As I
>> failed to
>> resolve this issue any other way (surprisingly, installing updates
>> using the
>> web based update installer now works - at the very least yesterday I
>> seem to
>> have installed a set of packages labeled b34?, installing updatetool
>> from
>> the command line still fails), I used one of our machines to install a
>> temporary proxy to see which URLs are requested by updatetool in
>> course of
>> trying its installation: Subsequently, running updatetool with proxy
>> configured revealed an attempted access to these both urls:
>>
>>
>> -> Jan 30 08:15:20.700 Privoxy(b7dfbb90) Request:
>> pkg.glassfish.org/v3/dev/solaris-x86/catalog/0
>>
>> ... this one works, both through updatetool and using a command line
>> browser.
>>
>>
>> -> Jan 30 08:15:23.061 Privoxy(b7dfbb90) Request:
>> pkg.glassfish.org/v3/contrib/solaris-x86/catalog/0
>>
>> ... this one doesn't work, neither from updatetool nor from the Solaris
>> command line browser nor using any other browser on my development
>> notebook,
>> so I blame this to be responsible for the updatetool installer
>> problems. :)
>>
>>
>> So to assume: Is the /contrib/ repository for solaris-x86 broken or
>> just a
>> wrong URL added to glassfish distribution here? For what I see, the
>> contrib
>> packages for Linux to be found at
>>
>> pkg.glassfish.org/v3/contrib/linux/catalog/0
>>
>>
>> reliably do work... Thoughts / comments on that? :)
>>
>>
>> Cheers and all the best,
>> Kristian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>