Wim Verreycken wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> Adam Bien wrote:
>> Should we file the bugs somewhere else, or posting to this list is
>> sufficient?
>
> I'd love if it where sufficient to just post them here.
> Just an idea, but maybe you guys could write some service monitorring this
> list like :
> If (subject startswith "bug")
> File new bug report;
> Reply to quality@... with bug report;
>
> Imho it would speed things up tremendously.
> Or am I the only one who doesn't like web interface bug report filing?
>
> Sorry for my lazy attitude. But it'll never change :)
I like this attitude ;).
Let me see if I can write a Thunderbird addon to achieve what
you want. It's an excellent idea. It will be a combo of Tb addon
and java.net gimmicks. (I will go to Kohsuke for help).
The only problem is defaulting the values for various fields on a bug
report. As a bug reporter, I guess, you need to do some due diligence
in the "follow-up", which probably can't be automated.
-Kedar
>
> Wim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerome.Dochez_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Jerome.Dochez_at_Sun.COM]
> Sent: donderdag 21 augustus 2008 18:17
> To: quality_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> Subject: Re: First bugs ?
>
> Hi Wim
>
> Thanks for taking the time to write issues, find my answers inline
>
> jerome
>
> Wim Verreycken wrote:
>> Found two bugs in v3tp2.
>>
>> 1) Grizzlyproxy bug?
>>
>> When starting v3tp2 there no check if the ports specified in server.xml
> are
>> already in use. Server starts with no errors being thrown (whereas v2ur2
>> will correctly state " Domain domain1 failed to startup. There is a
> conflict
>> on port 8080. Please check the server log for more details.)
>> While updating might wanna check also if there are no port conflict on any
>> of the other ports - v2ur2 only complains about port 8080, while actually
>> all ports needed (4848, 8181 and 8686 are in already in use)
>>
> yes, we have changed this, now the server will shutdown if ports cannot
> be opened successfully.
>> 2) context root on port 4848?
>>
>> context root for admin console should be / on port 4848, whereas in v3tp2
>> one would have to specify /admin in the url.
>>
> I believe Kedar will have that supported in b21.
>> As I said these exist in v3tp2. Will only file bug report if exists in
>> nightly build / build from trunk. No time today though. Maybe someone else
>> cares to check already ? (-> survivant , your build should be finished by
>> now? ;)
>>
>> Wim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Survivant 00 [mailto:survivant00_at_gmail.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 21 augustus 2008 15:45
>> To: quality_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> Subject: Re: where are the v3 prelude nightly builds ?
>>
>> good question.
>>
>> now I'm building it myself from the trunk. take 15 min to build.
>>
>> mvn -U -cpu clean install
>> 2008/8/21 Wim Verreycken <wim_at_pizzastop.be>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Wim
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>